Ep. 34: Mastering Photography Lighting: Natural Light vs Flash Techniques

WEBVTT

00:00:00.661 --> 00:00:12.387
Hi, my name is Kevin Ahronson from Hampshire School of Photography and Tog-Talk to 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0,.

00:00:12.489 --> 00:00:14.211
All engine running liftoff.

00:00:14.211 --> 00:00:16.635
We have a liftoff.

00:00:20.240 --> 00:00:21.922
And welcome to this week's .

00:00:21.922 --> 00:00:25.045
My name is Kevin Ahronson from Hampshire School of Photography.

00:00:25.045 --> 00:00:36.054
I've been a photographer since right at the end of the 1960s, so over 50 years behind a camera, and I've been teaching photography since 2009.

00:00:36.054 --> 00:00:44.645
That makes me seriously old, and I've got with me today a personification of youth.

00:00:44.645 --> 00:00:47.070
Why don't you introduce yourself?

00:00:47.090 --> 00:00:47.469
Kelly.

00:00:47.469 --> 00:00:49.393
Hello, I'm Kelly Perrin.

00:00:49.393 --> 00:00:56.051
I am the owner of the Big Ambition Company and we have our very own photography studio in Fleet Hampshire.

00:00:56.051 --> 00:01:06.123
I've been a photographer for 10 years roughly and I was student of Kevin's turned pro and I was student of Kevin's turned pro.

00:01:06.164 --> 00:01:10.132
What a delight it is to have you on this, our third episode together.

00:01:10.132 --> 00:01:15.825
Tell me, kelly, what's the subject we're discussing today and how did we come about?

00:01:15.825 --> 00:01:16.768
How do we choose it?

00:01:16.768 --> 00:01:17.671
How do we pick it?

00:01:18.980 --> 00:01:36.490
So we were having a discussion about things we could talk about on the podcast and I mentioned to you that you put a meme in the Facebook group Hampshire Photography Network.

00:01:36.490 --> 00:01:56.832
You popped a meme in there and I've seen this meme on a few different Facebook groups and it's Batman and Robin, few different Facebook groups and it's Batman and Robin and Robin is saying that he likes to shoot natural light and Batman slapping him and saying learn how to use flash, or vice versa.

00:01:56.832 --> 00:02:02.930
But it's basically the concept that if you don't use flash, it's because you don't know how.

00:02:02.930 --> 00:02:16.050
And I believe I said to you most of my work is with natural light or quite often no light at all, and I can use flash but I actually prefer not to.

00:02:18.164 --> 00:02:19.288
So let's discuss.

00:02:19.288 --> 00:02:31.671
So this could be quite a heated discussion If we put this, if we put a question inside the Facebook group and if you're not a member of the Hampshire Photography Network, anybody can join.

00:02:31.671 --> 00:02:35.170
You don't have to be in Hampshire, but you do need to be an amateur.

00:02:35.170 --> 00:02:53.286
So we don't want pros in there or semi-pros, we want people who are quite new on their photography journey, because countlessly I've come across over the years whenever there's someone in a group who is really skillful and posts amazing pictures, it actually prevents other people from posting.

00:02:53.286 --> 00:02:54.507
They feel a bit intimidated.

00:02:54.507 --> 00:03:03.927
So if you are an amateur, look up on Facebook the Hampshire Photography Network and you've got to answer four or five questions or something like that to get in and then we'll let you in.

00:03:03.927 --> 00:03:05.426
Anyway, what was the question?

00:03:09.780 --> 00:03:13.491
Natural versus artificial light is our subject.

00:03:14.360 --> 00:03:29.947
So what I was getting at is that if we were to post this inside the group, or indeed any group where there's a large number of photographers, you will end up with quite a heated debate.

00:03:29.947 --> 00:03:32.752
This is quite a divisive subject.

00:03:32.752 --> 00:03:39.286
Do I use natural light or do I use flash?

00:03:39.286 --> 00:03:47.316
Because there are lots of people the majority, I would say who don't use Flash.

00:03:47.316 --> 00:03:54.288
They don't know how to use Flash, and I don't want to use Flash and I have every empathy, every sympathy with them.

00:03:54.288 --> 00:03:55.691
Do you know why?

00:03:56.271 --> 00:03:56.532
Why.

00:03:57.461 --> 00:04:05.167
Well, you have to probably go back to about, actually, about 2009, which is about the same time as I was teaching, started teaching.

00:04:05.167 --> 00:04:20.098
Actually, it was about 2009, which is about the same time as I started teaching, and I was working for a charity and that particular charity were embarking on a large building project.

00:04:20.098 --> 00:04:51.670
Now, while I was working there, I was also shooting a lot of weddings, exclusively shooting with natural light, on the basis that flash doesn't look very flattering and if you're trying to capture people candidly which is what I was doing if a flash is going off during the reception or you wouldn't use it in the church but during reception it kind of puts people off and they get quite, yeah, aggressive, stop, keep firing that flash.

00:04:51.670 --> 00:04:58.985
So I was an exponent a passionate exponent of shooting with natural light.

00:04:58.985 --> 00:05:03.262
So all my lenses were very expensive lenses because I had to work in low light.

00:05:03.262 --> 00:05:06.240
I had a full frame camera Back then.

00:05:06.240 --> 00:05:09.588
It would have probably been a Canon 5D Mark II.

00:05:09.588 --> 00:05:11.781
I don't think the Mark III was out then, I can't remember.

00:05:11.781 --> 00:05:22.629
So I had a Mark II and a Mark III and I've still got a Mark IV, and even the very thought of using flash was a complete.

00:05:22.629 --> 00:05:43.488
It depressed me because, having shot with flash both in the studio and on camera back in the days of film, I knew how unattractive flash can sometimes be Very harsh shadows, very unattractive indeed.

00:05:43.488 --> 00:05:49.701
So I was completely anti-flash and very pro-natural light.

00:05:49.701 --> 00:05:52.447
I was an exponent of natural light.

00:05:52.447 --> 00:05:53.170
Does that sound good?

00:05:53.170 --> 00:05:53.752
It does.

00:05:53.752 --> 00:05:57.949
One likes to be an exponent, anyway.

00:05:58.130 --> 00:06:07.093
So I'm working with this charity and they invite the local newspaper to come and photograph what they were doing, and it meant going up onto the roof of our building.

00:06:07.093 --> 00:06:10.831
I had to take him up on the roof and he was photographing from up there, beautiful sunny day.

00:06:10.831 --> 00:06:15.889
And we got to a point where I'm climbing across the rooftops and he said stay there.

00:06:15.889 --> 00:06:24.427
And where I was when he said stay there, I was climbing over a roof, apex, with one leg on one side of the roof and one leg on the other.

00:06:24.427 --> 00:06:27.649
He said this is like a great picture for the paper, really.

00:06:27.649 --> 00:06:33.555
Yeah, ok, so he's a newspaper reporter and it's bright sunshine and he's shooting with flash.

00:06:33.555 --> 00:06:36.557
And I'm thinking what, why does he even do that?

00:06:36.557 --> 00:06:47.187
And I can hear him talking about making some adjustments to the back and he's saying, yeah, I'll just drop the power down on that about two thirds, and I said what you can adjust the power of your flash.

00:06:47.187 --> 00:06:58.656
So he very briefly gave me a simple lesson on how to make the flash brighter or darker than it normally wants to go, and I didn't realize that you could do that with flash.

00:06:58.656 --> 00:07:14.764
Within a month I had spent two grand on a system flash system with I think it was, four flashes and a transmitter from Canon might have been just over two grand because I fell in love with the idea of being able to control light.

00:07:14.764 --> 00:07:21.290
And then I bought studio lights and then from that point on, it's one of those situations you say the rest is history.

00:07:21.290 --> 00:07:26.660
And I fell in love with photographing with flash because finally I could control light.

00:07:27.021 --> 00:07:36.122
What that guy was doing on the rooftops was using fill-in flash Under bright sun.

00:07:36.122 --> 00:08:05.408
If you take a photograph of someone from almost any angle unless the sun's right behind them, you get part of their face lit by the sun and part of it in shade and it's a harsh, high contrasting shadow with sharp, hard edges and it's sometimes, if not nearly always, a very unattractive image because you've got these highlights and bright spots on one side and shadows on the other.

00:08:05.408 --> 00:08:10.586
You can't see too much detail in the shadow, and sometimes the highlights are so bright you can't see the details there.

00:08:10.586 --> 00:08:24.192
And so what he was trying to do was fire a little bit of flash into the image which doesn't affect the highlights very much but does dilute some of the darkness in the shadows.

00:08:24.192 --> 00:08:32.552
And he did that on this particular occasion by underexposing the flash by two-thirds of a stop.

00:08:32.552 --> 00:08:35.909
He reduced the power of the flash by two-thirds of a stop.

00:08:37.442 --> 00:08:50.072
Those who shoot in aperture or shutter priority know, on a camera you've got something called exposure compensation, where you can compensate for the camera getting exposure wrong by over or under exposing by just turning a dial.

00:08:50.072 --> 00:08:54.525
And I didn't realize you can do that with flash as well.

00:08:54.525 --> 00:09:00.621
So on the flash it's called FEC, flash exposure compensation.

00:09:00.621 --> 00:09:04.889
This was absolutely liberating for me, so.

00:09:04.889 --> 00:09:10.111
So I had no idea, and once I figured out how you could use it, I had so much control of my shots.

00:09:10.111 --> 00:09:21.669
So not only could I control the exposure on my camera through the exposure compensation because I rarely shot in manual but I could also control the brightness of my flash to be brighter or darker than it would normally shoot.

00:09:21.669 --> 00:09:23.942
So that gave me an enormous amount of control.

00:09:23.942 --> 00:09:28.571
So that's when I started shooting with flash properly.

00:09:29.552 --> 00:09:29.932
I love it.

00:09:29.932 --> 00:09:47.729
That's such a great story and, as you were talking, I remember so clearly in 2017, that lesson on flash outside, and I remember at the time thinking it's such a beautiful, sunny day, why on earth are we going outside to use flash?

00:09:47.729 --> 00:09:51.053
And it made so much sense in that lesson with you.

00:09:51.053 --> 00:10:00.647
And that story has just brought that lesson back, which is great.

00:10:00.647 --> 00:10:10.828
So, no, there obviously is massive benefits to using artificial light, but what I want to know to using artificial light, but what I want to know when do you enjoy not using artificial light?

00:10:10.828 --> 00:10:12.130
So when would you?

00:10:13.152 --> 00:10:25.359
I mean, obviously there's the golden hour but when are you likely not to have a flash with you?

00:10:25.359 --> 00:10:28.261
When am I likely not to have a flash with me?

00:10:28.261 --> 00:10:29.244
To be frank, most of the time.

00:10:29.244 --> 00:10:42.352
Um, one of the disadvantages as a flash is you have more gear to carry around with you, and if I'm shooting a paid gig then I will have flash in the car.

00:10:42.352 --> 00:10:49.726
I have a box which has got all these sponge inserts where you cut out holes, and I've got four flashes in there and I've got my transmitter.

00:10:49.860 --> 00:11:01.128
So if you don't know what I'm talking about here, guys, the simplest way of using a little battery-powered flash, which are also called speed lights that's the kind of generic name speed lights.

00:11:01.128 --> 00:11:09.386
In America they call everything strobes, so a flash over there is a strobe, whether it's a studio strobe or a battery powered strobe.

00:11:09.386 --> 00:11:12.402
So if you hear strobe on the internet, it's just the american way of saying flash.

00:11:12.402 --> 00:11:46.841
So if I'm using a speed light, which is a battery powered strobe or a battery powered flash, um, I can either put it on the camera, in which case I've got one flash sat on the camera, or I can take it off the camera in what's called, strangely enough, off-camera flash and remotely trigger it, and for that you need a transmitter or a trigger to sit on the top of your camera and you can control your flashes all your flashes from that controller sat on the top of your camera and you can control your flashes all your flashes from that controller set on the top of your camera.

00:11:47.062 --> 00:11:52.881
It goes in the flash shoe, the same place as a flash would, and you can have 15, 20, you can have 100 flashes.

00:11:52.881 --> 00:11:58.822
They're all controlled from your transmitter, otherwise known as a flash controller.

00:11:58.822 --> 00:12:04.390
I have this box with four flashes in and a controller.

00:12:04.390 --> 00:12:11.649
I've got additional flashes as well which are all synced into the same controller so I can take even more flashes with me if I need.

00:12:11.649 --> 00:12:26.288
So if I've got a party or a wedding or reception or a corporate bash somewhere, then I'll take flashes with me in my box and I know that I've instantly got four flashes if I need them, plus the system for triggering them.

00:12:27.139 --> 00:12:30.431
And of course you need lighting stands as well to put them on.

00:12:30.431 --> 00:12:37.111
If I'm out just for the day, I don't take the flash with me.

00:12:37.111 --> 00:12:40.888
I rely on natural light and I love natural light.

00:12:40.888 --> 00:12:58.323
I was thinking just recently, kelly, in the way I think we all do from time to time what is my favourite type of photography?

00:12:58.323 --> 00:13:07.299
Because I was going to put a post in the Facebook group which said if you could only pick one type of photography for the rest of your life, for the rest of your life, what would it be?

00:13:07.299 --> 00:13:26.668
And if I could pick just one type of photography that I could only shoot and nothing else, it would be out on the street, one camera, one lens, one focal length, no zoom, because I know I could find so many things to photograph that would satisfy me aesthetically.

00:13:28.302 --> 00:13:35.186
And when I'm using natural light, I am in my greatest element, because that's how I started.

00:13:35.186 --> 00:13:48.941
As a 14-year-old, with my first camera, I'd walk around the streets of Brighton, which is where I grew up, and I would just find things to photograph based on what I saw was light, creating amazing images.

00:13:48.941 --> 00:14:16.572
So I'm using natural light to form the kind of images that I really like, and it could be buildings or it could be people, could be a bit of landscape, but it's looking for the light and the shadow and how they contrast with each other, how they play against each other and if you've got some kind of repeating patterns going on or reflections and textures, all these things interact with the highlights and the shadows.

00:14:16.572 --> 00:14:22.125
Ultimately, that's light and that's what I really enjoy doing.

00:14:22.125 --> 00:14:40.178
However, that's what I really enjoy doing, however, knowing that if the situation demands some help, likewise, I can turn to artificial light to sex up the shot, if you get my meaning.

00:14:46.336 --> 00:14:47.057
What about you?

00:14:47.057 --> 00:15:09.014
Well, the type of photography that I do, I just can't have a flash because I'm often behind the scenes in theatres or I'm walking around a conference hall and lots of people are, you know, are talking and concentrating.

00:15:09.014 --> 00:15:11.259
So I'm often asked not to have a flash with me and I prefer that.

00:15:11.259 --> 00:15:20.481
We've spoken before about what I like about photography and I love getting those candid shots of people, and you can't do that if you've got a flash with you because everybody becomes aware that there's a photographer in the room.

00:15:20.481 --> 00:15:27.892
I'm happy to go around without a box of flash equipment.

00:15:27.892 --> 00:15:38.173
To be honest, I do like flash and now that I've got the studio, I'm using it a lot more and I'm probably similar to you.

00:15:38.653 --> 00:15:46.134
If, if I could only do one type of photography, yeah, it would just be outside.

00:15:46.134 --> 00:16:04.592
Because, again, when I was given my first camera as a Christmas present, the first thing I did was I went straight in the garden and I just took pictures of flowers and blades of grass and the dogs and you know anything that I liked.

00:16:04.592 --> 00:16:09.481
The look of that looked pretty, I feel like.

00:16:09.481 --> 00:16:14.393
For you, you enjoy the contrast, whereas I'm a bit more of a soft.

00:16:14.393 --> 00:16:17.969
I kind of like the softer photos.

00:16:17.969 --> 00:16:25.354
So I wouldn't necessarily look for harsh light differences in my image.

00:16:26.743 --> 00:17:00.592
I don't know whether that makes a difference or the thing is, because photography is such a big subject, there's room for everybody to do what they want in their own way, and if there's one irritation I have about photography, it's photographers who are dogmatic, who are dogmatic, who their way is the right way and anyone who challenges that is in the wrong.

00:17:00.592 --> 00:17:14.669
Because I grew up photographing the way I've just described, it's easy for me, for instance, to see a picture and visualise it in real time as if it's actually a me.

00:17:14.669 --> 00:17:29.127
For instance, to see a picture and visualise it in real time as if it's actually a black and white image, because I shot in black and white for decades, and I mainly shot in black and white for decades because it was much easier to process and print black and white than it was to print colour.

00:17:29.127 --> 00:17:38.384
In fact, I'd never printed colour and I shot a lot of transparencies during the 70s and the 80s and the 90s, but I never processed any colour.

00:17:38.384 --> 00:17:39.125
I couldn't be bothered.

00:17:39.125 --> 00:17:40.288
It was too much of a fad.

00:17:40.288 --> 00:17:42.682
But black and white was relatively straightforward.

00:17:43.023 --> 00:17:48.064
So what it meant was that I developed a skill of being able to see in black and white.

00:17:48.064 --> 00:18:00.355
I could spot an image that would work brilliant in black and white by searching around, just looking around and looking for areas of intense brightness and and darkness and the contrast between the two.

00:18:00.355 --> 00:18:04.647
So any area where there's a lot of highlights, a lot of specular highlights, a lot of deep shadows.

00:18:04.647 --> 00:18:08.044
I could see that in a black and white preview of my brain.

00:18:08.044 --> 00:18:11.352
As black and white I knew exactly what it was going to look like.

00:18:11.352 --> 00:18:34.503
You can put me anywhere and I'll find a shot that will work, because I have that ability of and our eyes trade over decades to just spot shots based on the play of light, and for me personally, it's the light that is the most powerful element of an image if you're going to suck someone's attention into that image.

00:18:34.503 --> 00:18:53.987
So it's interesting that you're talking about your own professional aspect of photography of working in low light, because for weddings I shot in low light for a very long time, refusing to go over to flash.

00:18:59.200 --> 00:19:37.726
But with weddings and the weddings is a good example, probably by the second decade of this millennia I began to think again Because I was always disappointed with those shots you get towards the end of the day at the wedding reception, particularly the first dance, where all the lights go down, and you're shooting at around about 3200 ISO maybe 6.4 on cameras in those days where the sensors just weren't capable of shooting decent pictures at those high what was then?

00:19:37.726 --> 00:20:16.026
High ISO levels, and not only were the images very grainy but the cameras weren't able to focus in that low light and you'd shoot dozens and dozens and dozens of images and nothing was in focus and eventually I can't remember what the moment was, what the catalyst was, but at one point I decided to bring some flash in during the first dance for a wedding and it worked so well.

00:20:16.026 --> 00:20:21.188
From that point on, all my wedding first dance images were shot with flash.

00:20:21.188 --> 00:20:22.672
So how did I do that?

00:20:23.561 --> 00:20:24.445
I had off-camera flash.

00:20:24.445 --> 00:20:38.184
I had at least two flashes up high on stands, pointing at the ceilings of the buildings, bouncing off the ceilings so they come back down and they would illuminate the bride and groom from behind, left and the right.

00:20:38.184 --> 00:20:55.292
So you get a rim light on the left and the rim light on the right, and then I'd use it what little ambient light there was to get the face of the couple, which was relatively, compared with the highlights, quite low, and those shots were spectacular.

00:20:55.292 --> 00:20:58.865
They looked amazing and from that point on I stayed with flash.

00:21:00.047 --> 00:21:13.690
Now you can't shoot flash on your jobs no, I can't, usually because the the sort of jobs I'm doing um are being filmed as well.

00:21:13.690 --> 00:21:20.346
Yeah, so if I'm at a conference and the conference might be being live streamed, they don't want flash going off.

00:21:20.346 --> 00:21:29.228
It messes with their lighting that they've set up.

00:21:29.228 --> 00:21:48.287
Um, certainly, when I'm in theatre, you, you can't use a flash, but I guess, because I don't use flash very often, I would opt not to take it and save my kind of artificial lighting for when I'm in the studio.

00:21:51.229 --> 00:21:53.351
Okay, I remember also.

00:21:53.351 --> 00:22:09.433
I remember shooting a wedding at the Aviator Hotel in Farnborough and after the initial ceremony everybody went upstairs and I walked into the bar.

00:22:09.433 --> 00:22:11.463
Oh my word, the light was amazing.

00:22:11.463 --> 00:22:15.012
The sun was shining through the windows, very low, warm.

00:22:15.012 --> 00:22:19.171
It was end of day and it just looked sensational.

00:22:19.171 --> 00:22:25.493
And as everybody came into the room and sat at their tables all that light's a bit glaring quick put the blinds down.

00:22:25.493 --> 00:22:27.428
It was awful.

00:22:27.539 --> 00:22:42.928
So I had to resort to flash on camera bouncing off the ceiling, and the way I did it is I used a 135mm lens so I could shoot some distance and allow quite a big gap between me and the person I was photographing.

00:22:43.601 --> 00:22:58.067
And that enabled me to shoot at a moderately shallow angle, bouncing off the ceiling, which meant as the light came down off the ceiling, it wasn't coming down too steep, it was coming in at a low angle, which meant as the light came down off the ceiling, it wasn't coming down too steep, it was coming in at a low angle which filled all the eye sockets.

00:22:59.644 --> 00:23:04.887
Otherwise, if you're too close to someone, the light goes up, comes down and you get something called raccoon eyes.

00:23:04.887 --> 00:23:06.748
You get a nasty shadow in the eye sockets.

00:23:06.748 --> 00:23:10.545
But I was a long way away, shooting on a 135, it was an F2 lens.

00:23:10.545 --> 00:23:26.163
I was shooting it wide open with flash, and I was getting amazing shots, and the revelation that I experienced was no one gave a fig about the flash going off, and I thought hang on a second.

00:23:26.163 --> 00:23:37.814
I've been working under the premise for years that this would upset everybody, but it didn't, so from that point on, I converted to using flash at a wedding.

00:23:37.814 --> 00:23:43.892
It wouldn't work where you are, though, because your requirements are very specific.

00:23:43.892 --> 00:23:47.923
Now you're using a Canon 5D Mark IV.

00:23:48.263 --> 00:23:48.744
Mark III.

00:23:48.865 --> 00:23:56.555
Mark III Okay, and you're shooting at f 1.8 on a 50 mil lens most of the time uh 1.4 1.4.

00:23:56.555 --> 00:24:01.404
Okay, okay, what isos are you having to shoot at?

00:24:02.605 --> 00:24:09.855
um, well, usually uh, 32, 32, yeah, if I can.

00:24:09.855 --> 00:24:11.740
If I need to go up, then I will.

00:24:11.740 --> 00:24:13.905
Yeah, but I try not to do, do you?

00:24:13.945 --> 00:24:17.112
do any post-processing to reduce that?

00:24:17.392 --> 00:24:37.240
I do, I do, and also I wait for moments of natural light or artificial light sometimes, and if I can grab shots when there's a little bit of light, somebody's maybe looked at their phone so they light up their own face of light.

00:24:37.240 --> 00:24:53.665
Somebody's maybe looked at their phone so they light up their own face, um, or maybe if we're backstage and there are lights on stage and they're kind of moving around, um, and it might hit somebody's face behind the scenes, then I'll use, I'll use things like that, um, so I you know I work with what I've got.

00:24:53.665 --> 00:25:03.571
What I would like to talk to you about, though, is you are very pro artificial light.

00:25:03.571 --> 00:25:19.541
From this conversation, everything comes back to how you work around using so that you can use flash, um using so that you can use flash.

00:25:19.541 --> 00:25:28.403
So my question for you is for people listening who don't use flash for whatever reason what modifiers and things can you use with artificial light to enhance your photos?

00:25:30.365 --> 00:25:32.348
oh, there's a big question.

00:25:32.348 --> 00:25:49.990
The biggest problem that most photographers experience when they first buy a flash is they stick it on their camera, they point it at the person they're photographing and they wonder why the picture is unflattering.

00:25:49.990 --> 00:25:57.172
And the simple answer is it's a very small point of light or point source.

00:25:57.172 --> 00:26:07.701
It's often called a point source of light which creates harsh shadows like the sun does when you photograph someone on an overcast day.

00:26:07.701 --> 00:26:14.280
Very flattering, because there's no single point of light that the light's coming from.

00:26:14.280 --> 00:26:18.249
It's everywhere in the sky, so you end up with a very diffused light.

00:26:18.249 --> 00:26:22.826
It's a bit like having a light bulb and putting a sheet in front of it before it hits the subject.

00:26:22.826 --> 00:26:26.130
The cloud is a sheet diffusing the light from the sun.

00:26:26.130 --> 00:26:44.712
So if you're photographing anybody unless you are looking for that particular high contrast, almost aggressive style of lighting, which generally we're not, although some men lean themselves to be it works quite well.

00:26:44.712 --> 00:26:51.863
If you're trying to call a macho, masculine man, look, look a lot of those adverts at christmas time you get from those french perfume companies.

00:26:51.863 --> 00:27:09.471
They're all shot like you know, the guys with the chiseled jaw and heavy dark shadows very masculine, but for the most of the time you know, when you're photographing the kids and your female partner, wife, whatever they are and even your husband, for most of the time you actually don't want that harsh look.

00:27:09.471 --> 00:27:10.340
You want a soft look.

00:27:10.340 --> 00:27:19.202
So with a single flash on your camera, pointing it at them is going to get you the worst possible shot.

00:27:19.202 --> 00:27:25.663
You have to bounce it, and either you bounce it off the ceiling or you bounce it off the wall.

00:27:25.663 --> 00:27:29.851
And in terms of modifiers you don't need anything else.

00:27:29.851 --> 00:27:35.711
You just need a nice light coloured wall, preferably a white one, where you can bounce the light off.

00:27:35.711 --> 00:27:51.826
And the reason it's better to bounce than it is to have a point source is that as the light leaves your camera, it spreads out, it goes out as an a-hawk, it's like a cone of light.

00:27:51.826 --> 00:27:59.568
So it's small at its original source and it gets wider and wider as it leaves the flash.

00:27:59.568 --> 00:28:15.180
By the time it hits the wall or the ceiling, it might be three, four, five, six feet in diameter, and then, when it leaves that reflected surface, the wall or the ceiling, it widens up even even more so by the time it hits your subject.

00:28:15.180 --> 00:28:27.067
It's an enormous source of light, a bit like the clouds in the sky, and you envelop someone in a broad, wide beam of light which is very flattering.

00:28:27.067 --> 00:28:31.544
It's soft and it's lovely and it's sumptuous and it's just so nice.

00:28:31.544 --> 00:28:35.113
So never, ever, ever, ever, ever, point your flash to it.

00:28:35.113 --> 00:28:35.801
You have someone.

00:28:35.801 --> 00:28:38.390
Unless you're going for a specific special effect, you bounce.

00:28:38.390 --> 00:28:45.251
Now what happens if you've got nowhere to bounce?

00:28:45.251 --> 00:28:49.580
So I'm going to go back to the aviator, because there was a good example there At that wedding.

00:28:50.482 --> 00:29:03.250
I was on the top floor and the crowd from the reception were mingling around everywhere and there were some on the top floor and a couple came up to me and said would I take their picture?

00:29:03.250 --> 00:29:08.924
And I looked around, the walls were black, looked at the ceiling, the ceiling was black.

00:29:08.924 --> 00:29:10.505
Where the hell do I?

00:29:10.505 --> 00:29:14.510
I can't point this flash at them.

00:29:14.510 --> 00:29:16.165
It would be a dreadful photograph.

00:29:16.165 --> 00:29:17.182
I've got a reputation.

00:29:17.182 --> 00:29:18.527
I had nothing.

00:29:18.527 --> 00:29:25.906
Suddenly this I'm going to use a word here which is not politically correct and I don't care this fat bloke walked by.

00:29:25.906 --> 00:29:31.462
He's a big guy, and I said hang on, a guy, take your jacket off.

00:29:31.462 --> 00:29:41.924
I got him to stand with his back towards me and because he was so big, I was able to bounce the flash of the back of his shirt onto the couple I was photographing and I got the shot I want.

00:29:45.271 --> 00:29:45.894
You're laughing.

00:29:45.894 --> 00:29:49.724
So if you don't have a reflector, just find a fat bloke.

00:29:51.621 --> 00:29:53.628
Yeah, not a fat lady, because they don't exist.

00:29:53.628 --> 00:30:16.032
No, obviously Voluptuous, not fat yeah, so, um, yes, the other option is to have a portable reflector with you, which is a usually a circular thing which comes in a smaller form, and you unzip it and it pops up into a larger diameter and you can bounce a light off of that and then it reflects back onto the subject.

00:30:16.319 --> 00:30:19.028
And, of course, bringing it back to artificial light.

00:30:19.028 --> 00:30:22.970
That's what you can do with the sun as well.

00:30:22.970 --> 00:30:31.144
It is, so you can also use the sunlight to your advantage with reflectors and things like that and also diffusers.

00:30:33.260 --> 00:30:54.855
So because I just want to root for the artificial light, I'm gonna put you on the spot, then just explain the difference between a diffuser and a reflector so a diffuser will spread your your light more evenly, whereas a reflector you can use to bounce the light around.

00:30:55.160 --> 00:30:55.823
Yeah, so if?

00:30:55.843 --> 00:31:00.068
you're working outside those two items, which often come in the same thing.

00:31:00.068 --> 00:31:06.269
You buy something called a five-in-one it's a generic term and it's like a circular dish.

00:31:06.269 --> 00:31:07.625
It comes in a little bag.

00:31:07.625 --> 00:31:14.229
You undo the zip and as you open it the whole thing pops up to be a lot bigger and there's a zip running around the outside of that.

00:31:14.229 --> 00:31:21.685
But leave the zip on for a second, because as you look at it, there's got this big circular thing which could be anything from well.

00:31:21.685 --> 00:31:31.653
They do small ones, maybe from like 18 inches, and you can go up to things which may be six foot across, all in different sizes, dead cheap from amazon, absolutely pennies.

00:31:31.720 --> 00:31:33.808
And one side would be white, which you can use a reflector.

00:31:33.808 --> 00:31:36.519
One side would be white, which you can use as a reflector.

00:31:36.519 --> 00:31:44.385
One side could be black, which absorbs light, so you can take away light from the things you don't want to be too bright.

00:31:44.385 --> 00:31:49.682
Take the zip off and reverse it and you've got a silver reflector and a gold reflector.

00:31:49.682 --> 00:31:52.409
Silver reflects more light, but it's more harsh.

00:31:52.409 --> 00:31:55.253
Gold is great for end of daylight.

00:31:55.253 --> 00:32:01.907
If you're photographing someone on a sunset or a sunrise, you can bounce a gold light onto their face.

00:32:01.907 --> 00:32:03.226
It just looks fabulous.

00:32:03.226 --> 00:32:10.028
And then if you take that off completely, that reversible thing, just remove it, so you put it to one side.

00:32:11.260 --> 00:32:23.971
What you're left with in the middle of this circular thing is a diffusion screen, which is a transparent screen which is a bit like the clouds, again on an overcast day.

00:32:24.883 --> 00:32:32.031
You could hold that over somebody on a bright, sunny day and the sun would be diffused through that screen.

00:32:32.031 --> 00:32:37.147
That person would still be as bright as ever, but they wouldn't have those harsh shadows.

00:32:37.147 --> 00:32:58.288
So if you're photographing someone on a bright, sunny day and you know it's midday and the sun's up high and the shadows are just horrible, ask an assistant to hold the diffusion screen above the model's head, or you put it on a stand and you get great shots of them without all those horrible shadows.

00:32:58.288 --> 00:33:06.220
On the other hand, with flash you could fire a flash through it and it diffuses the light from.

00:33:06.220 --> 00:33:09.905
The flash creates a very large source of light.

00:33:09.905 --> 00:33:23.790
The diameter of your diffuser screen whether you've got a two foot, three foot, four foot, six foot, whatever makes a huge source of light and again you get a lovely soft, diffused light hitting that person.

00:33:23.790 --> 00:33:30.852
So both reflectors and diffusers work with artificial light and natural light.

00:33:31.933 --> 00:33:32.255
Lovely.

00:33:32.255 --> 00:33:47.292
And another question for you, just because, given our audience and I try to think back to when I was beginning my photography journey explain what the golden hour is.

00:33:48.641 --> 00:33:52.228
There's two of them one in the morning, one in the evening.

00:33:52.228 --> 00:34:07.071
It's that time when the sun's really low in the sky and it's having to shine through a lot more atmosphere to get to you, because it's dropped down and it's close to the horizon.

00:34:07.071 --> 00:34:35.847
When it's above you, it's only got that small distance between you and it only about 93 million miles, you know but because it has to shine through more atmosphere when the sun's low, you end up with this lovely warm light which is so attractive because as the sun is going through more atmosphere, more particles in the atmosphere, the light gets diffused so the shadows are softer.

00:34:35.847 --> 00:34:44.530
It's a bit like having a diffusion screen fitted to the sun, but with an orange, warm tinge to it.

00:34:44.530 --> 00:34:53.690
It is just the best time to photograph people, with no exceptions, and also, if you're, to landscape photography marvellous.

00:34:54.219 --> 00:35:11.135
I was just going to say not just people, because a couple of my During Covid I did quite a lot of landscape photography just so I could go and be on my own, to be honest, and have some time away from the family, and that golden hour was just.

00:35:11.135 --> 00:35:17.844
I've got some really beautiful images of Fleet Bond, where it just is.

00:35:17.844 --> 00:35:28.135
I mean, it's stunning anyway, but you know, rich blue sky, even though it was sort of seven o'clock in the evening, and again at Virginia Waters.

00:35:28.135 --> 00:35:34.041
You know we're so lucky around here with the places we can go and get landscape.

00:35:34.041 --> 00:35:39.461
You don't have to be up in the Lake District to get beautiful shots, which is nice.

00:35:41.851 --> 00:36:04.135
I'm just thinking because these are subjects I often teach about on my masterclass, and masterclass is a one-year class, a one-year course teaching the basics of photography, from the very foundational building blocks to some quite high levels of uh, imagery, photographing people or landscapes.

00:36:04.135 --> 00:36:31.163
There's a lot of compositional, creative elements to the course as well, but this thing about shooting at sunrise and sunset there's some interesting things here, and one of them is we're talking about light now, and without flash, if you photograph a sunset, the sunset could be absolutely beautiful.

00:36:31.163 --> 00:36:42.574
You know, you just occasionally come across one where the clouds in the sky are perfect, the sun's hitting them at the right angle, there's highlights, there's warm shadows, the scenery.

00:36:42.574 --> 00:36:44.440
You just happen to be in a really good place.

00:36:44.440 --> 00:36:46.277
You take a picture and it looks.

00:36:46.277 --> 00:36:49.780
It just doesn't look the same, does it?

00:36:51.590 --> 00:36:59.681
So, on the other hand, you want to photograph, say, you're doing a romantic engagement shoot.

00:36:59.681 --> 00:37:11.721
You know you've got a couple getting married and they say, oh, come and take a picture of us and you go out somewhere, romantic and the sun's low and you've got this lovely warm glow in them, but they want the sun behind them in the shot.

00:37:11.721 --> 00:37:20.954
Well, if you put the sun behind them and correctly exposed for a really good sun, they go quite dark, almost silhouette.

00:37:20.954 --> 00:37:24.242
So you have to use other lighting to illuminate them.

00:37:24.242 --> 00:37:28.911
So you fire a flash, go on.

00:37:28.911 --> 00:37:30.277
You were going to say something, weren't you?

00:37:30.577 --> 00:37:31.039
I was.

00:37:31.039 --> 00:37:35.360
I was just for the non-flash users, or correct me if I'm wrong.

00:37:35.360 --> 00:37:44.740
You could take two photos and expose them differently and then layer them after you could, you, could, you could.

00:37:49.711 --> 00:37:51.789
Which some might say is a very creative way of getting the perfect shot.

00:37:52.992 --> 00:37:55.255
A lot of work, I know, but I'm a designer.

00:37:55.255 --> 00:38:01.605
I quite enjoy the post-processing just as much as taking the photo, and you know I do as well.

00:38:01.784 --> 00:38:07.353
Yeah, I'm talking in my late night FM voice, okay.

00:38:07.353 --> 00:38:31.458
So first of all, if you're shooting in natural light on the sunset and forget people in the shot at the moment but our cameras are designed to work most of the time in something what's called auto white balance you might see on your camera is the three initials awb, and the purposes of that are to try and make whites look white regardless of the shooting condition.

00:38:31.458 --> 00:38:43.358
So if you're moving indoors, where maybe you've got a nice orange glow for the lights in there, and you go outside and maybe it's early evening but a bit too, I don't know yes, it'll look kind of bluish in comparison.

00:38:43.358 --> 00:38:53.344
The camera adjusts reasonably well to give you a white that looks white under any circumstances.

00:38:53.344 --> 00:38:59.536
But if you photograph a sunset, the camera's going to look at that, thinking gosh, that's a bit red.

00:38:59.536 --> 00:39:01.005
So what it does?

00:39:01.005 --> 00:39:03.568
It adds some blue electronically into the image to try and balance out that red, so that it's a bit red.

00:39:03.568 --> 00:39:03.686
So what it does?

00:39:03.686 --> 00:39:07.056
It adds some blue electronically into the image to try and balance out that red so that it's not so red.

00:39:07.056 --> 00:39:10.780
So you end up with a picture where the sunset doesn't look as good.

00:39:10.780 --> 00:39:13.414
How did he get around.

00:39:13.414 --> 00:39:15.715
That I'm going to tell you in a second.

00:39:16.751 --> 00:39:28.204
Hi everyone, it's Kevin Ahronson and I want to tell you about some exciting changes I've made to the Photography Masterclass, my in-person course that's been helping photographers grow since 2019.

00:39:28.204 --> 00:39:32.161
Yep, this is an in-person course in a classroom, with me face-to-face.

00:39:32.161 --> 00:39:33.655
This is not online.

00:39:33.655 --> 00:39:41.641
As we approach our 10th intake in January, I've made some significant changes to celebrate this milestone.

00:39:41.641 --> 00:39:45.731
This masterclass goes beyond just technical skills.

00:39:45.731 --> 00:39:49.179
It's about learning to see the world as a photographer.

00:39:49.179 --> 00:39:58.313
I've shifted the focus to give even more attention to creativity, with three entire modules dedicated to developing your photographer's eye.

00:39:58.313 --> 00:40:06.336
I retained the more popular modules on shooting landscapes, photographing people, and there's a new one on black and white photography.

00:40:06.336 --> 00:40:10.217
This Masterclass is more than just a course.

00:40:10.217 --> 00:40:20.019
It's a creative one-year journey you'll share with other passionate photographers, growing together and forming lasting connections along the way.

00:40:20.019 --> 00:40:21.554
Need more information?

00:40:21.554 --> 00:40:27.152
Visit GoHSPcom, click on courses and select masterclass.

00:40:27.152 --> 00:40:30.702
I'll also provide a link in the show notes below.

00:40:30.702 --> 00:40:34.851
Welcome back, okay.

00:40:34.871 --> 00:40:48.641
So now I'm going to tell you the secret how to really pimp up your sunsets and your sunrises, because the camera in auto white balance is trying to make whites always look white.

00:40:48.641 --> 00:41:00.675
It'll take the powerful oranges and reds out of your sunset and almost kind of desaturate them On your camera.

00:41:00.675 --> 00:41:09.056
There could be a setting on your auto white balance which says either cloud or shade, and some cameras have both.

00:41:09.056 --> 00:41:31.362
When you select those, as opposed to water white balance, you're adding orange back into the shot and you're replacing the orange that's been taken out by the auto white balance and what happens is your sunsets now just look amazing because the blues have not been imposed upon the shot.

00:41:31.362 --> 00:41:36.130
The orange has been imposed back into the shot and now it looks incredible.

00:41:36.130 --> 00:41:43.742
And if you want to, you can actually go in and you can customise just how orange the images are.

00:41:43.742 --> 00:41:48.820
You can really pimp up the orange so that the sunset looks spectacular.

00:41:49.931 --> 00:41:54.476
So I never, ever, shoot sunrise or sunset in auto white balance ever.

00:41:54.476 --> 00:41:56.398
I never do it and I haven't done it for years.

00:41:56.398 --> 00:42:05.480
I always shoot to cloud or shade and sometimes I dial up because colour temperature is measured in degrees Kelvin.

00:42:05.480 --> 00:42:09.896
I pimp it up to 10,000 degrees Kelvin and it just goes off the scale.

00:42:09.896 --> 00:42:11.757
So that's what I do for sunrise and sunset.

00:42:11.849 --> 00:42:19.739
Now let's go back to the other question, because that was for natural light Photographing that couple with the sun behind them as the sun goes down.

00:42:19.739 --> 00:42:40.577
If you can photograph someone like that with an off-camera flash in a small brolly or a softbox which is a large box, it's basically shooting the flash into a diffusion screen which kind of softens the light.

00:42:40.577 --> 00:42:54.440
If you shoot with flash, the light coming from the flash is very, very blue compared with the light that's coming from the sun.

00:42:54.440 --> 00:43:08.400
So whilst you can get a good exposure, for that couple standing against the sun, it looks weird Because you're correctly exposing for the sun in the background.

00:43:08.400 --> 00:43:24.896
You may even be shooting in cloudy or shade to increase the orange effect of the sun and the clouds and so on, but the flash is throwing a blue light effectively from the camera's perspective.

00:43:24.896 --> 00:43:30.318
We may not see it as humans, but the camera sees it as a blue light and it just doesn't look right.

00:43:30.318 --> 00:43:33.530
Any idea how you solve that?

00:43:34.489 --> 00:43:36.215
No, you tell us have.

00:43:36.235 --> 00:43:42.860
I got to tell you yes, okay, you stick an orange gel on the flash.

00:43:42.860 --> 00:43:50.556
Okay, it's normally called CTO, color, temperature orange, and what that does?

00:43:50.556 --> 00:43:56.271
Cto will throw an orange light onto the cup of your photographing which balances out nicely with the sun.

00:43:56.271 --> 00:44:11.677
Now CTO comes in full CTO or half CTO or quarter CTO, and you can vary the combination so that it matches the sun and a lot of flashes.

00:44:11.677 --> 00:44:17.018
When you buy them, they come with a little kit with little gels, coloured gels, which you can choose from.

00:44:17.018 --> 00:44:28.380
If not again, it's pennies, probably less than a tenner on Amazon you can get a set and you just stick them on the front of your flash and you experiment to find what combination of CTOs gives you the right colour.

00:44:28.380 --> 00:44:31.420
So it's all about colour adjustment.

00:44:31.420 --> 00:44:31.963
There we go.

00:44:32.003 --> 00:44:32.405
I'm learning.

00:44:32.405 --> 00:44:33.914
Yeah, yeah, yeah, Still learning.

00:44:33.914 --> 00:44:39.672
Kevin, I'm going to have to go and find a couple on a sunset now and have a little go at this.

00:44:42.317 --> 00:44:44.039
Jo, I think we've covered quite a bit today.

00:44:44.199 --> 00:44:44.599
We have.

00:44:44.599 --> 00:44:46.903
I do just have one last question for you.

00:44:46.903 --> 00:44:48.891
Hit me, babe.

00:44:48.891 --> 00:44:57.284
So, as you know, I have a studio in Fleet that is available for photographers to hire out if they want to practice.

00:44:57.284 --> 00:45:05.885
So my question for you what would be your go-to lighting setup in a studio if you were doing portraits?

00:45:06.911 --> 00:45:07.833
my go-to.

00:45:07.833 --> 00:45:13.603
If there was sufficient space, I would use a clam shelf as a go-to.

00:45:13.603 --> 00:45:16.875
Clam chair was a soft box hitting the person from above.

00:45:16.875 --> 00:45:44.269
So it's a big, broad spread of light hitting them from above and complemented with another one coming from underneath, so like a clam, you know, which has comes together with the top and bottom impossible to demonstrate on an audio show, but a light source above, a light source below, because the one from above always casts a little bit of shadow, albeit soft, and the clamshell bottom half kind of takes away some of that.

00:45:44.269 --> 00:45:47.429
It's very flattering, for ladies and for children it's wonderful.

00:45:47.429 --> 00:45:55.429
And then possibly some lights from behind to give a bit of a rim around the hair maybe.

00:45:55.429 --> 00:45:57.030
But it depends on the background.

00:45:57.030 --> 00:46:01.030
If you have a white background you need lights to illuminate the white background.

00:46:01.030 --> 00:46:04.581
But the clamshell I absolutely love and I have done for years.

00:46:04.581 --> 00:46:08.240
It's my absolute favourite because it is so flattering.

00:46:08.949 --> 00:46:09.994
Excellent, thank you.

00:46:11.036 --> 00:46:11.639
Not at all.

00:46:11.639 --> 00:46:17.750
Okay, well, it's been a good sesh Been a good sesh it has.

00:46:17.750 --> 00:46:19.456
Thank you for coming again.

00:46:19.456 --> 00:46:31.545
I'm kind of hoping that this new now know you coming to the studio as opposed to you recording it from home remotely is going to be far more successful.

00:46:31.867 --> 00:46:40.632
I mean, on my headphones it sounds great yeah, I think it flows nicer as well it's nice to be able to see the person you're talking to rather than looking at a screen.

00:46:40.632 --> 00:46:51.293
Yeah, yeah, okay, in that case, shall we say our usual it's goodbye from me and it's goodbye from me.

00:46:51.293 --> 00:46:58.023
Well, that about wraps up another episode of Photographers in Conversation.

00:46:58.023 --> 00:47:04.039
Before we go, I want to remind you that we'd love to hear from you.

00:47:04.039 --> 00:47:05.630
Got a burning question, a burning photography question.

00:47:05.630 --> 00:47:10.862
Click on the link in the show notes below and it'll take you to a button on a website.

00:47:10.862 --> 00:47:16.702
Press that button and record your question straight into your phone or your laptop's microphone.

00:47:16.702 --> 00:47:21.702
If your question is selected, it'll get played live on air and we'll answer it.

00:47:21.702 --> 00:47:26.137
Thanks so much for listening and for your continued support.

00:47:26.137 --> 00:47:31.215
Don't forget to hit the subscribe button and give this episode a like if you enjoyed it.

00:47:31.215 --> 00:47:36.458
I'll see you next time and don't forget, take your camera with you everywhere.