Is RAW really superior to JPG?

WEBVTT

00:00:01.100 --> 00:00:01.721
Hi and welcome.

00:00:01.721 --> 00:00:06.633
My name's Kevin Ahronson from Hampshire School of Photography, and this is a duo.

00:00:06.633 --> 00:00:08.685
Yes, it's me and Kelly Perrin.

00:00:08.685 --> 00:00:13.785
Hi, kelly, hello, give me that Radio 2 late night FM voice.

00:00:13.785 --> 00:00:16.192
Hello, I'll buy it.

00:00:16.192 --> 00:00:19.748
Welcome back, it's great to have you back.

00:00:19.748 --> 00:00:21.106
Thank you for having me back.

00:00:21.359 --> 00:00:22.946
It's been two weeks and I've missed you.

00:00:22.946 --> 00:00:26.530
I know I've been to Santorini and everything in between I went to Bogna.

00:00:26.530 --> 00:00:30.579
I'll take Santorini over Bogna.

00:00:31.983 --> 00:00:33.268
Oh God, you don't live, do you?

00:00:33.268 --> 00:00:37.810
No, I haven't really been to Bogna and there's a good reason why I haven't been to Bogna.

00:00:37.810 --> 00:00:41.408
But I can't say on air Only family know why I don't go to Bogna.

00:00:41.408 --> 00:00:53.862
I family know why I don't go to Wagner.

00:00:53.862 --> 00:00:55.664
I should stop talking because I'm going to dig a hole for myself.

00:00:55.664 --> 00:00:56.225
Anyway, let's play the intro.

00:00:56.225 --> 00:00:56.466
Let's do it.

00:00:56.485 --> 00:01:04.798
Hi, my name is Kevin Ahronson from Hampshire School of Photography and welcome to Tog Talk.

00:01:04.798 --> 00:01:05.459
5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0,.

00:01:05.459 --> 00:01:05.859
All engine running.

00:01:05.859 --> 00:01:07.200
Liftoff.

00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:07.960
We have a liftoff.

00:01:10.563 --> 00:01:11.763
Well, here we go again.

00:01:11.763 --> 00:01:13.885
So this is our fourth together, is that correct?

00:01:13.885 --> 00:01:16.588
Yes, excellent.

00:01:16.588 --> 00:01:19.731
I really enjoyed the last one so much.

00:01:20.451 --> 00:01:22.114
The last chat was really good.

00:01:22.754 --> 00:01:24.075
Oh, it was lighting, wasn't it?

00:01:24.075 --> 00:01:25.456
It was, it was lighting, yeah.

00:01:25.617 --> 00:01:35.933
It was, and actually I really enjoyed reading some of the comments as well on the Facebook group about it, because I am not alone in my love for natural light.

00:01:35.953 --> 00:01:37.801
You are not alone, right?

00:01:37.801 --> 00:01:40.388
Well, we've got a good one, haven't we today?

00:01:40.989 --> 00:01:42.484
We have I'm excited about today.

00:01:42.484 --> 00:01:49.165
I've got many, many questions for you which I think a lot of your listeners are going to appreciate.

00:01:49.186 --> 00:01:50.188
Oh, exciting.

00:01:50.188 --> 00:01:54.242
Yes, Well, do tell what's the subject this week, Kelly.

00:01:54.543 --> 00:02:00.733
So the subject is RAW and JPEG and the differences between them.

00:02:02.221 --> 00:02:05.831
That old doozy, that old chestnut, as they say.

00:02:05.831 --> 00:02:08.467
Doozy is something you'd hear from an American.

00:02:08.467 --> 00:02:11.171
You don't hear English people saying that's a doozy, do you?

00:02:11.171 --> 00:02:12.842
No, you don't, it's very American.

00:02:13.224 --> 00:02:14.149
Very American.

00:02:14.340 --> 00:02:18.682
And I tend not to partake in too many Americanisms, apart from burgers.

00:02:19.605 --> 00:02:24.985
When I'm in America I go ever so posh Does one Very, very British.

00:02:28.485 --> 00:02:31.282
I get totally posh and I snort and I'm not talking coke.

00:02:31.442 --> 00:02:32.723
Well, glad to hear it.

00:02:33.264 --> 00:02:36.250
All right, so we're looking at JPEG versus RAW.

00:02:36.250 --> 00:02:38.092
It's a cracking subject, it is.

00:02:38.173 --> 00:02:45.210
I wonder who thought of that I'm going to say it was me, but I'm 100% sure it was you.

00:02:45.210 --> 00:02:46.699
But for the podcast, I'm going to say it was all me.

00:02:46.699 --> 00:02:48.807
They'll never know, they'll never know.

00:02:48.807 --> 00:02:54.770
But I am going to kickstart this with a very simple question for you.

00:02:55.431 --> 00:02:55.832
Okay, go on.

00:02:55.939 --> 00:02:57.125
Which is Kevin.

00:02:57.306 --> 00:02:57.486
Yes.

00:02:57.560 --> 00:03:02.479
Can you please explain in the simplest terms what RAW is?

00:03:02.689 --> 00:03:07.558
Yes, In simplest terms what RAW is.

00:03:07.579 --> 00:03:29.033
Yes, and because I run a lot of workshops where I'm teaching quite new photographers, often I find I have to do this because they've either not heard of it at all or they've seen it in the menu system on their camera but just don't have a clue what it is.

00:03:29.860 --> 00:03:41.072
So RAW if you don't know, first of all it's spelling it's R-A-W, as in RAW data, it's the RAW data that's coming off the sensor of your camera.

00:03:41.072 --> 00:03:46.152
So you take a picture, you point your camera at something.

00:03:46.152 --> 00:04:01.513
A light comes in through the through the lens, passes through the aperture, goes past the shutter, it hits the sensor and it's stored on the sensor as data, electrical impulses, and that raw data is a raw file.

00:04:01.513 --> 00:04:07.768
So you can take that, put it on your computer and with the right software you can see the picture that was taken.

00:04:07.768 --> 00:04:15.671
And because it is the raw data, it's the most amount of data that we have of any photograph.

00:04:15.671 --> 00:04:25.512
So in any other format we use to take a picture, something's been taken away and has been modified, but in the raw data form it's the raw data.

00:04:25.512 --> 00:04:35.067
It's unadulterated, untouched, unadjusted, straight off the sensor onto your computer or via a memory card in most cases.

00:04:35.961 --> 00:04:46.269
So what you're saying is there are billions of colours, for example, as opposed to a JPEG file, where there are perhaps only a million different colours.

00:04:49.322 --> 00:05:07.173
Ooh, one thinks one has jumped the gun there a little bit, because I can tell you that a JPEG will produce about 16 million colours, whereas a RAW file can produce something in the approximate region of 68,790,476,736.

00:05:07.781 --> 00:05:09.005
So, yes, there we go.

00:05:09.005 --> 00:05:18.144
Yes, quite a big difference when it comes to data, and I think the terminology that people will be used to hearing is a JPEG is a compressed file.

00:05:18.245 --> 00:05:32.737
Yeah, in simple terms, if the raw file is the raw data off of the sensor, it's the photograph, without any changes being made to it.

00:05:32.737 --> 00:05:39.579
So there are no alterations to the brightness or the colours or the sharpness or anything like that.

00:05:39.579 --> 00:05:41.125
It is untouched.

00:05:41.125 --> 00:05:52.625
But JPEG files, which is what most people start off taking photos with, and, you know, on their phones usually, although not so much recently on Apple.

00:05:52.625 --> 00:05:53.309
So that's changed.

00:05:53.309 --> 00:06:01.473
But JPEGs are the go-to standard for image files.

00:06:01.473 --> 00:06:06.112
If you look at most images on the internet, they're JPEGs, not all of them.

00:06:06.112 --> 00:06:19.387
And if you send an image to someone by email or you stick it on social media, it's probably going to be a JPEG, and JPEGs are.

00:06:19.387 --> 00:06:27.831
They're an answer to the problem we had back in the 90s, when the internet was in its infancy.

00:06:27.831 --> 00:06:30.766
So are you old enough?

00:06:30.766 --> 00:06:33.108
Now be honest with me, because I don't think you are.

00:06:33.108 --> 00:06:36.089
Are you old enough to remember dial-up?

00:06:36.089 --> 00:06:38.579
Yes, you do remember dial-up.

00:06:38.841 --> 00:06:39.906
I do remember dial-up.

00:06:39.906 --> 00:06:50.228
I'm old enough that we didn't have email and computers in our house when I was growing up, not until I was probably 10.

00:06:50.228 --> 00:06:53.910
Between 10 and 15 did we get a computer in the house.

00:06:53.910 --> 00:06:57.466
Unfortunately, I am old enough.

00:06:58.661 --> 00:07:10.187
So for those who are of a certain age, we will remember dial-up, where we use our telephone line to access the internet, and and web pages took absolutely ages to load up.

00:07:10.187 --> 00:07:11.309
There's a.

00:07:11.309 --> 00:07:27.954
There was a group of people who were called the joint photographic experts group jpeg that's where it comes from joint photographic experts group and they devised a way to reduce the file size of photographs to make them smaller.

00:07:27.954 --> 00:07:38.391
In other words, not the images actually smaller in size to look at, but the actual file space they took up on your computer or on the servers that you were uploading to.

00:07:38.391 --> 00:07:56.096
So when you took a photograph and you wanted to put it on your website, the website was loaded on the internet what we now call the cloud and it was loaded on a server which is a big computer somewhere in the middle of probably america, and it took a long time for an image to upload from your computer to that one.

00:07:56.096 --> 00:08:08.634
So they needed a way to make that file size smaller and files needed to be compressed in size, and they came up with this file, which they called a JPEG.

00:08:08.634 --> 00:08:23.451
It's as simple as that, and a JPEG is quite clever in that it doesn't contain all the information that a picture has when it was originally taken.

00:08:23.451 --> 00:08:38.932
It strips some of the information out and also at the same time it gets adjusted to make it look really good, looking loads of colour and the sort of really strong blacks and whites and so on and at the same time the file is reduced in size.

00:08:38.932 --> 00:08:40.788
It's compressed, so it looks good.

00:08:40.788 --> 00:08:45.912
It fits in a very small footprint, if you like.

00:08:45.912 --> 00:08:56.268
So it's reduced in size and it's easily transportable so you can send it to another computer and these days you can just send it by phone.

00:08:56.268 --> 00:08:57.927
It's a small file, it's great.

00:08:59.419 --> 00:09:10.971
So the JPEG was devised as a way of making images small to upload via dial-up, because broadband was yet a dream in our eyes.

00:09:10.971 --> 00:09:21.315
It just hadn't arrived yet and other types of files would be too big and too slow to send to the internet.

00:09:21.315 --> 00:09:26.591
And people wanted images on their websites particularly photographers makes sense.

00:09:26.591 --> 00:09:39.568
But almost everybody wanted pictures because just looking at pages and pages of text was boring and if you are that age you remember some of those early websites were pages and pages and pages of text.

00:09:39.568 --> 00:09:57.822
They were tedious and people would do bold writing, uppercase capitals for entire words, or they'd color them red to give them more impact and it just looked horrible it did we've moved on a bit we have, so bringing it back um.

00:09:58.344 --> 00:10:10.616
most default settings on cameras are jpeG, so for new photographers, what is the benefit of switching to RAW?

00:10:12.880 --> 00:10:16.028
Okay, let me tell you a bit more than about JPEG.

00:10:16.028 --> 00:10:22.206
First of all because once you understand what happens with JPEG and how we get to JPEG from your camera.

00:10:22.206 --> 00:10:31.168
So when you take a picture in your camera the data is saved and initially it is a raw file for everybody.

00:10:31.168 --> 00:10:41.139
But unless you tell the camera otherwise, that data in your camera, off the sensor, then goes through a series of algorithms.

00:10:41.139 --> 00:10:43.268
It's programmed by the factory.

00:10:43.268 --> 00:10:54.331
So whether you bought it from Canon or Nikon or Fuji or wherever it was, there's a programming algorithm which takes that data and does a whole bunch of things.

00:10:54.331 --> 00:10:59.886
It will do things like adjusting the colour, adjusting the brightness.

00:10:59.886 --> 00:11:11.368
It sharpens the image, it will add some noise reductions, add some white balance adjustment and a few other things which are a bit technical.

00:11:11.368 --> 00:11:23.110
And then it compresses that file to a level where the manufacturer thinks the picture still looks good, but it's reduced in size.

00:11:23.110 --> 00:11:25.489
It doesn't take up so much space on the memory card.

00:11:25.489 --> 00:11:30.572
So JPEGs are really good because they produce great pictures out of the camera.

00:11:30.572 --> 00:11:36.168
They're a small file size, they're easily transportable and everybody can open up a JPEG.

00:11:36.168 --> 00:11:38.788
They're universally acceptable everywhere.

00:11:38.788 --> 00:11:46.969
You'd have to be really hard-pushed to find a computer which doesn't open up a JPEG so universally acceptable.

00:11:47.340 --> 00:11:49.307
Now, why would you want to go to RAW?

00:11:49.307 --> 00:11:54.750
The RAW data has had nothing done to it.

00:11:54.750 --> 00:12:08.205
And if you take a RAW file and it's now saved onto your memory card and you put that memory card in your computer and you look at it, you'll need software to look at it.

00:12:08.205 --> 00:12:10.070
So probably lightroom is the most common one.

00:12:10.070 --> 00:12:15.609
You'll look at it in lightroom and you compare it next to a jpeg version of the same image.

00:12:15.609 --> 00:12:18.153
It looks as dull as hell.

00:12:18.153 --> 00:12:25.131
It looks as if it looks anemic, it looks as if it's it needs to go on a high iron diet.

00:12:25.131 --> 00:12:26.774
It really does look naff.

00:12:26.774 --> 00:12:32.019
It lacks contrast, it lacks color, it just lacks any kind of excitement whatsoever.

00:12:32.019 --> 00:12:35.746
And that's because nothing's been done to it.

00:12:35.746 --> 00:12:38.533
The jpeg, on the other hand, that looks sexy.

00:12:39.094 --> 00:12:47.909
And the manufacturers, when they they write those algorithms and they program their cameras to produce jpegs, when they write those algorithms and they program their cameras to produce JPEGs, obviously they want images which are so good.

00:12:47.909 --> 00:12:49.105
You want to buy their cameras.

00:12:49.105 --> 00:12:56.048
If you bought a really expensive camera but the JPEGs were naff, you'd dump it and change it for something else.

00:12:56.048 --> 00:12:59.409
So all the manufacturers are trying to produce great JPEGs.

00:12:59.409 --> 00:13:11.929
But here's the thing, because in the process of shrinking that file to make it small, data would have been lost.

00:13:14.407 --> 00:13:25.808
If you want to then edit the image, you're limited on what you can do because much of the information about the file the colour, the tones has been stripped away.

00:13:25.808 --> 00:13:34.248
If you try to edit the raw file, all the data's there and you can do loads with it.

00:13:34.248 --> 00:13:50.686
So Lightroom in particular, but there are other products, but globally Lightroom is the leader by such a long margin is that you can call it the standard, the standard product that most photographers around the world use.

00:13:50.686 --> 00:13:52.850
It is the go-to product.

00:13:52.850 --> 00:14:00.515
It's easy to work with, it's got a very easy learning curve and it's generally accepted.

00:14:00.515 --> 00:14:06.866
That's the one most people have if they're prepared to pay the monthly fee, which is about ten a month, and you get Photoshop thrown in for that as well.

00:14:06.866 --> 00:14:10.980
So there's your choice as a photographer.

00:14:11.301 --> 00:14:23.480
You have a JPEG which is straight out of the camera looking great, small file size, easily transportable, everybody can look at it, or you use a raw file.

00:14:23.480 --> 00:14:30.967
You need software to edit it and you take full creative control of what the image looks like.

00:14:30.967 --> 00:14:34.251
So with the JPEG you've got limited control.

00:14:34.251 --> 00:14:36.384
There's only so much you can do with a raw file.

00:14:36.465 --> 00:14:45.947
There's loads, and when I say loads, if you've taken a picture and there's a lot of shadows in a picture, with a raw file you can bring out detail in the shadows.

00:14:45.947 --> 00:14:50.525
Now our eyes can pick that out straight away, but cameras have a very limited dynamic range.

00:14:50.525 --> 00:14:52.955
Our eyes have a much wider dynamic range.

00:14:52.955 --> 00:14:57.827
That is the ability to see the detail between the brightest parts and the darkest parts.

00:14:57.827 --> 00:15:01.245
We can see into the shadows and we can see details in highlights.

00:15:01.245 --> 00:15:04.414
Camera sensors have not yet got that stage.

00:15:04.414 --> 00:15:06.019
I'm sure they will do eventually.

00:15:06.019 --> 00:15:24.373
So with a raw file you've got lots of access to the shadow detail, lots of access to the highlight detail and through editing you can bring that detail out so that note.

00:15:25.053 --> 00:15:34.212
Can you give me an example of a situation where you've managed to save a photo because you've shot it in RAW?

00:15:35.659 --> 00:16:23.065
So I can answer in general terms because this is something which crops up constantly, especially as a new photographer, and it's quite common for new photographers to take images where they've not quite got the exposure right and the things come out dark, quite dark, and being able to put a RAW file into Lightroom and grab that image and increase, and it's effectively like increasing the ISO afterwards If you push up the exposure slider in Lightroom, it's pretty much the same as if you cracked up your ISO so you can brighten up the picture and so an image which otherwise would look quite dull and dark and there's nothing going on, you can rescue and completely transform it.

00:16:23.065 --> 00:16:25.177
Actually, I can think of one because there's nothing going on, you can rescue and completely transform.

00:16:25.177 --> 00:16:28.144
Actually, I can think of one because there's one I often teach on.

00:16:28.144 --> 00:16:31.130
So, um, I run a workshop.

00:16:31.130 --> 00:16:44.548
Maybe three years ago it was shortly after, um, the lockdown I run a three-day landscape workshop on the dorset coast and I went down some weeks ahead of that with the wife.

00:16:44.668 --> 00:16:51.450
We stayed overnight in a hotel to research locations and our hotel overlooked Corfe Castle.

00:16:51.450 --> 00:16:55.664
So I'm up at five o'clock in the morning with the camera to get Corfe Castle.

00:16:55.664 --> 00:17:04.810
I actually walked out of the room we were in and into the garden and I got a straight, clear view of it, and it was sunrise.

00:17:04.810 --> 00:17:12.771
So this is about five o'clock in the morning, it was sunrise, but corv castle has a reputation of being completely surrounded by clouds.

00:17:12.771 --> 00:17:14.102
So often it's spectacular.

00:17:14.102 --> 00:17:16.289
It's the most photographed castle on the planet.

00:17:16.289 --> 00:17:16.590
It's.

00:17:16.590 --> 00:17:20.963
It's incredible, and from the right location you can get some amazing shots.

00:17:20.963 --> 00:17:34.709
But I was taking it from the garden of the hotel room that we were staying in and the mist had descended onto the castle and I could see it and I could see the sun hitting one side of the building.

00:17:34.709 --> 00:17:36.145
So the sun was seriously low.

00:17:36.145 --> 00:17:50.847
It was coming out more or less over the water, but the whole scene was surrounded in this orange, muggy fog, which was low cloud, and I thought this is dreadful.

00:17:51.881 --> 00:17:54.160
Anyway, I took some shots and I took them on a long lens.

00:17:54.160 --> 00:17:59.732
I had a 100-400mm zoom lens on my Fuji.

00:17:59.732 --> 00:18:03.190
I think I was using a X-H2, I think it was.

00:18:03.190 --> 00:18:06.047
Might not have been, might have been an X-T4.

00:18:06.047 --> 00:18:14.184
Doesn't matter, it was a Fuji crop sensor camera with a 1-400 zoom and I got the shot I wanted.

00:18:14.184 --> 00:18:19.612
But, my God, it just looked like a really misty, old, muggy nothingness.

00:18:21.521 --> 00:18:22.265
So what did I do?

00:18:22.265 --> 00:18:29.570
I stuck it into Lightroom and I started pushing up the sliders and I got rid of most of that mugginess.

00:18:29.570 --> 00:18:31.960
I got rid of the cloud with some of the sliders.

00:18:31.960 --> 00:18:37.086
There's a slider there that has a purpose, designed just to cut through smoke and cloud.

00:18:37.086 --> 00:18:39.203
It's a fantastic slider.

00:18:39.203 --> 00:18:40.669
It became my saviour.

00:18:40.961 --> 00:18:57.557
So by judicious editing, I completely transformed the shot and then, for fun, I used Photoshop to put a fresh sky and I put flocks of birds in the sky and I transformed the foreground and the picture looked amazing and I posted it on Facebook and it went viral and there were thousands of people liking it.

00:18:57.557 --> 00:19:00.749
I thought, jesus, if only they knew it was a fake Anyway.

00:19:00.749 --> 00:19:06.220
So now I do own up it's a fake and I show this at most of my workshops.

00:19:06.220 --> 00:19:10.721
So first of all, I show them the picture in its final form and people go, wow, what a great picture.

00:19:10.721 --> 00:19:21.145
And then I show them the picture that I actually took, which was the worst picture in my library, but it just shows you the potential of Photoshop to rescue a shot anyway.

00:19:21.165 --> 00:19:21.888
What was the question?

00:19:21.888 --> 00:19:33.623
Hi everyone, it's Kevin Ahronson and I want to tell you about some exciting changes I've made to the Photography Masterclass, my in-person course that's been helping photographers grow since 2019.

00:19:33.623 --> 00:19:37.578
Yep, this is an in-person course in a classroom, with me face-to-face.

00:19:37.578 --> 00:19:39.163
This is not online.

00:19:39.163 --> 00:19:47.104
As we approach our 10th intake in January, I've made some significant changes to celebrate this milestone.

00:19:47.104 --> 00:19:49.351
January.

00:19:49.351 --> 00:19:50.775
I've made some significant changes to celebrate this milestone.

00:19:50.795 --> 00:19:51.979
This masterclass goes beyond just technical skills.

00:19:51.979 --> 00:19:54.606
It's about learning to see the world as a photographer.

00:19:54.606 --> 00:20:03.734
I've shifted the focus to give even more attention to creativity, with three entire modules dedicated to developing your photographer's eye.

00:20:03.734 --> 00:20:09.278
It's all about learning to see the world with a fresh perspective, beyond just the technical aspects.

00:20:09.278 --> 00:20:17.840
Having said that, you will still learn about the key foundations of photography, upon which every other element of the craft is built.

00:20:17.840 --> 00:20:25.981
I retained the more popular modules on shooting landscapes, photographing people, and there's a new one on black and white photography.

00:20:25.981 --> 00:20:29.839
This masterclass is more than just a course.

00:20:29.839 --> 00:20:39.641
It's a creative one-year journey you'll share with other passionate photographers, growing together and forming lasting connections along the way.

00:20:39.641 --> 00:20:41.213
Need more information?

00:20:41.213 --> 00:20:43.981
Visit GoHSPcom.

00:20:43.981 --> 00:20:47.560
That's GoHSP, g-o-h-s-p dot com.

00:20:47.560 --> 00:20:50.457
Click on courses and select masterclass.

00:20:50.457 --> 00:20:54.037
I'll also provide a link in the show notes below.

00:20:54.897 --> 00:21:09.769
So here's another example where you can use that ability as a raw file, not to rescue the shot, but to deliberately restore the shot that you take on purpose bad when you take it.

00:21:09.769 --> 00:21:11.212
So what do I mean by that?

00:21:11.212 --> 00:21:13.016
Right here we go.

00:21:13.016 --> 00:21:32.566
So you're taking a shot and it could be a person maybe they've got some blonde hair and the sun's catching it and it's really, really bright or it's an animal, could be landscape, it could be anything where there's a strong source of light and when you take the picture, part of that scene is massively overexposed.

00:21:32.566 --> 00:21:42.423
So let's say you're photographing a blonde child on a really sunny day and the sun's catching her from behind and her hair is super, super bright as the sun catches it.

00:21:42.423 --> 00:21:45.880
If you looked closely at those pixels they would be blown out.

00:21:45.880 --> 00:21:51.076
They're so overexposed that no software in the world can restore them.

00:21:51.076 --> 00:21:54.044
Okay.

00:21:54.064 --> 00:22:01.978
So one technique is, when you're photographing something like that, is you photograph it to underexpose the shot.

00:22:01.978 --> 00:22:05.262
It's called exposing for the highlights.

00:22:05.262 --> 00:22:19.211
So you deliberately underexpose the shot so it's darker than normal, so that those otherwise blown out pixels are no longer blown out, that they're correctly exposed.

00:22:19.211 --> 00:22:23.162
But in getting them correctly exposed, the rest of the picture goes dark.

00:22:23.162 --> 00:22:29.539
This is where shooting in raw comes to the rescue.

00:22:29.539 --> 00:22:44.598
So you put that into your light room and now you push up all the shadows and the darker elements of the picture to restore the rest of the face and the hair of that child, and of course long, so long as you don't push up the brightness of the bright blonde hair.

00:22:44.598 --> 00:22:52.540
What you then end up with is a properly exposed child with some lovely highlights which aren't blown out, so you're underexposed.

00:22:52.580 --> 00:22:58.019
To start off with and then bring up those shadows in post processing we tend to call it.

00:22:58.019 --> 00:22:59.522
We bring it up in post.

00:22:59.522 --> 00:23:03.739
It sounds more american in hollywood when they're shooting their films.

00:23:03.739 --> 00:23:05.202
Oh yeah, we'll fix it in post.

00:23:05.202 --> 00:23:06.816
It means in post-processing.

00:23:06.816 --> 00:23:17.696
A lot of people frown on it, but there are some techniques where you literally do have to fix it in post because you can't take the shot any other way unless you use flash.

00:23:18.259 --> 00:23:18.720
Excellent.

00:23:18.720 --> 00:23:21.778
Yes, let's not get on to flash again.

00:23:21.778 --> 00:23:32.044
So are there situations where you would actually recommend sticking with JPEG over RAW, even as a professional photographer?

00:23:32.263 --> 00:23:34.133
Yeah, absolutely so you should know.

00:23:34.133 --> 00:23:36.621
When I'm doing a paid gig, I shoot RAW.

00:23:36.621 --> 00:23:41.622
When I'm shooting private stuff, I shoot JPEG Interesting.

00:23:41.622 --> 00:23:51.618
So when I go on holiday, I shoot JPEG, and the main reason for that is when I come back I don't want to have to spend hours editing my holiday photos.

00:23:51.618 --> 00:23:52.602
I really don't.

00:23:52.602 --> 00:23:59.557
In fact, that would impact my work because it would take a long time, but that's me.

00:23:59.557 --> 00:24:09.301
There are photographers who are in situations where shooting JPEG is absolutely the right answer for them.

00:24:09.789 --> 00:24:13.532
Yes, I am one of those photographers Not always.

00:24:13.532 --> 00:24:16.561
I don't very often shoot in JPEG, pray tell.

00:24:16.561 --> 00:24:36.883
So one of the sort of contracts that I have is a playground company and I can go into hundreds of schools in a year and take some pictures of their play equipment, which is usually 30 to 40 children running around a playground on play equipment.

00:24:36.883 --> 00:24:38.276
It's very hectic.

00:24:38.276 --> 00:24:48.160
I usually have a 15-minute slot and they like a lot of images, so that kind of quick-paced, get as many images as you can.

00:24:48.160 --> 00:24:51.131
Um, I will always shoot in jpeg.

00:24:51.131 --> 00:25:00.433
Also, they want a really quick turnaround, so they want those photos the same evening and they'll usually booking three or four schools in a day.

00:25:00.433 --> 00:25:18.434
So you can imagine in in in a day I'm taking over a thousand photos in four different schools and so for me shooting in jpeg, I don't have to spend any time editing yeah, yeah, yes, um, and of course, by the time you get home, you're exhausted as well.

00:25:18.575 --> 00:25:20.580
Yes, yeah, yeah, I've been there, done that.

00:25:20.580 --> 00:25:22.593
So, yeah, I absolutely agree.

00:25:22.593 --> 00:25:29.104
There are lots of occasions where photographers are in similar situations to that, where jpeg are the logical answer.

00:25:29.104 --> 00:25:55.363
So if you're, if you're a sports photographer and you're under a deadline to get the pictures back to the newspaper or the magazine very quickly later that day, you shoot them in jpeg, not just because they're quicker to transfer and they're instant, but because you could be shooting images in high-speed burst and you can shoot more high-speed burst in JPEG than you can in RAW.

00:25:55.363 --> 00:25:56.834
Because they're smaller files.

00:25:56.834 --> 00:25:59.761
It's easier for the camera to process them.

00:26:00.009 --> 00:26:17.049
If you're shooting big, huge 30, 40, 50, 60 megapixel RAW files, which are enormous file sizes, and trying to do a burst on them, most cameras will limit you on the number of images that they'll store in their buffer.

00:26:17.049 --> 00:26:20.817
Your memory card in your camera needs to be enormous.

00:26:20.817 --> 00:26:24.353
The space on your hard drive just needs to get bigger and bigger.

00:26:24.353 --> 00:26:29.423
It's memory hungry, shooting RAW all the time in burst mode.

00:26:29.423 --> 00:26:45.309
So most sports photographers would probably today still prefer to shoot in JPEG because they can rattle off hundreds more than they can RAW and still get great shots because the technology today is so good.

00:26:45.309 --> 00:26:50.856
If you get your pictures properly exposed, a jpeg will produce a stunning image.

00:26:51.156 --> 00:27:18.510
It will do yes, and I have actually been caught out shooting raw where all of a sudden something's happened and I've ended up taking a stream of photos really quickly and my camera has just stopped stored and it's awful because then you get that panic of I'm going to miss the shot because, I don't know, maybe a celebrity's walked in the room or something's happened and there's been a big reaction and you're waiting for your camera to catch up.

00:27:18.510 --> 00:27:21.195
It's uh, it's not the best feeling.

00:27:21.195 --> 00:27:26.513
Yeah, yeah, yeah, but it happens, you know, and I think that's it's nice.

00:27:26.513 --> 00:27:39.659
I think, especially when I think that's it's nice, I think, especially when I think back to before I was a professional photographer, I certainly felt if I wasn't shooting in RAW, I couldn't call myself a photographer, and that's probably one of the biggest myths.

00:27:40.851 --> 00:28:17.633
Well, I knew obviously we were going to be talking about this today and, whilst I was fairly confident I could talk about the technical aspects, what interested me was the psychological aspects, because when you have a conversation with other photographers about JPEG versus RAW, you do get quite strong opinions, and that's one of the reasons we're discussing it now, because people have strong opinions and I decided to investigate the psychology behind people wanting to shoot in RAW.

00:28:17.633 --> 00:28:33.182
And it's the way that people are about wanting to buy or invest in professional level something to demonstrate they're serious about whatever it is they do.

00:28:33.182 --> 00:28:36.901
So I've worded it like that because it doesn't just apply to photographers.

00:28:36.901 --> 00:28:53.892
So we know that there are photographers who buy the most expensive gear, the most expensive lenses, the shoot with the biggest memory cards and the biggest computers, even though it's not going to make their pictures any better but it makes them feel better that's the one it makes them feel better.

00:28:54.272 --> 00:29:10.726
It does make them feel better, but there's also a sense and I can understand this of trying to show people that they're serious about their hobby and it also brings them into the club, if you like, of of serious photographers.

00:29:10.726 --> 00:29:21.913
It kind of says, yeah, I've got all this gear, I'm serious about what I do and I'm prepared to spend the money to buy the best tools.

00:29:21.913 --> 00:29:35.368
Now this particular psychological trait is called the tall T-O-O-L fallacy, the tall fallacy, and it doesn't just affect photography, it affects just about any hobby.

00:29:35.368 --> 00:29:43.693
So, as a musician who was absolute rubbish, I bought the most expensive guitar I could afford, if you're into guitars.

00:29:43.693 --> 00:29:45.116
For my midlife crisis.

00:29:45.156 --> 00:29:47.021
I bought a Martin acoustic.

00:29:47.021 --> 00:29:49.699
Martin makes one of the most expensive acoustics on the planet.

00:29:49.699 --> 00:29:53.661
And I bought a Fender Stratocaster American, but I didn't buy the normal one.

00:29:53.661 --> 00:29:56.539
I paid extra for the super special one with all the gadgets on it.

00:29:56.539 --> 00:29:59.057
But I'm a crap guitarist.

00:29:59.057 --> 00:30:09.433
You look at all the guys who go out and take cycling up for a hobby and they'll spend four and a half grand, ten grand, on a bike and they just go out on a weekend.

00:30:09.433 --> 00:30:23.383
Or let's take another hobby, home gym and you know you get a bike, and then you'll get the weights, and then you'll buy one of those bikes called A cross trainer.

00:30:23.403 --> 00:30:24.164
Pelotron, oh, a Pelotron, yeah.

00:30:24.691 --> 00:30:32.781
So people start investing in the most expensive training gear at home because they think it's going to make them more physically fit.

00:30:32.781 --> 00:30:36.159
It doesn't matter what the hobby is.

00:30:36.159 --> 00:30:44.663
As a species, that's what we do because it identifies us as a group, as someone who's serious.

00:30:44.663 --> 00:30:56.859
We want to be identified as being serious and so, going back to RAW, I think there's a bit of that in the psychology for some photographers.

00:30:56.859 --> 00:31:03.240
I'm not going to say everybody's like that, because there is a genuinely good case for shooting with RAW.

00:31:03.240 --> 00:31:16.982
The one thing that you learn the longer you're involved in any hobby or my case, hobby stroke profession is that there is no simple answer.

00:31:16.982 --> 00:31:19.971
When someone says why do I shoot raw or jpeg?

00:31:19.971 --> 00:31:20.593
What should I do?

00:31:20.593 --> 00:31:22.455
There is no simple answer.

00:31:22.455 --> 00:31:26.740
The the answer is, as is in almost every question I get asked.

00:31:26.740 --> 00:31:27.241
Guess what?

00:31:28.884 --> 00:31:39.192
it depends so what are some of the common mistakes that beginners make when they're shooting in raw, and what can they do to avoid them?

00:31:40.634 --> 00:31:43.358
I don't think it's the shooting of raw.

00:31:43.358 --> 00:31:44.320
That's the problem.

00:31:44.320 --> 00:31:45.923
It's the editing skill.

00:31:46.222 --> 00:31:47.665
Yeah.

00:31:52.150 --> 00:32:14.877
The tool fallacy argument is very interesting because it talks about how people will often buy the very best or shoot with the best software or raw files, in our case on the basis that that's what professionals do, and so they're spending money on gear and software without actually investing the time and or money in learning how to operate everything properly.

00:32:14.877 --> 00:32:20.017
So they're relying on technology to produce their images rather than their skill level.

00:32:20.017 --> 00:32:26.049
So when a newcomer starts shooting RAW, shooting RAW won't make their pictures better.

00:32:26.049 --> 00:32:30.914
In fact, it'll probably make them worse until they've mastered editing skills.

00:32:30.914 --> 00:32:37.664
Because with jpeg the camera creates a great photo.

00:32:38.070 --> 00:32:41.938
With raw, you've got to create a great photo.

00:32:41.938 --> 00:32:46.192
It's down to you to apply your creative eye to that image.

00:32:46.192 --> 00:32:53.258
You've got to take a very bland photograph with virtually no colour in it and no contrast in it, and you've got to sex up that image.

00:32:53.258 --> 00:32:59.997
You've got to know how to rescue that image and turn it into something people will want to look at, and you just can't do that overnight.

00:32:59.997 --> 00:33:02.499
It takes months and years of practice.

00:33:02.499 --> 00:33:08.296
There's a pause there for effect.

00:33:11.140 --> 00:33:13.884
So we don't just have raw images and JPEG.

00:33:13.884 --> 00:33:26.778
For those people that use Photoshop or Lightroom or any of the other post-editing software, you have the option to export into other types of files.

00:33:26.778 --> 00:33:28.982
Let's talk about that for a little bit.

00:33:30.109 --> 00:33:46.474
Okay, this is another episode on its own, but very briefly, and let's just stick to some of the more common ones, one of the better alternatives to JPEGs is a PNG file.

00:33:46.474 --> 00:33:47.898
That's png Portable network graphics.

00:33:47.898 --> 00:33:48.662
That's what it stands for.

00:33:48.662 --> 00:33:58.103
That'sa really nerdy thing, and a png file has a number of advantages over jpegs.

00:33:58.103 --> 00:34:01.031
One of them is that you can use a transparent image.

00:34:01.031 --> 00:34:21.221
So if you wanted to use it, if you created a picture of your kid, for instance, and you wanted to post that kid over a background of a beautiful mountain range, you can cut the kid out on Photoshop with a transparent background created as a PNG file and that child could then be posted over the mountains.

00:34:21.221 --> 00:34:40.302
It probably works better in terms of graphics on a website, where you can have a transparent background behind a person or behind your guitar or whatever it is, and you can superimpose that over something else and only that person will appear, not the background behind them.

00:34:40.302 --> 00:34:43.039
The rest has been rendered as a transparent background.

00:34:43.039 --> 00:34:52.559
So transparency in PNG files is quite helpful, and you can also create layers in png files where you can save layers in png files.

00:34:52.559 --> 00:35:06.693
But I guess one of the biggest advantages that png files have over jpegs is that the image quality is better and doesn't deteriorate with additional savings.

00:35:06.693 --> 00:35:26.224
So here's the thing that a lot of people don't know about JPEGs If you have a JPEG image and maybe you do some editing on it and then you save it, that process of saving it does the same thing again to that file as it did the first time it was saved.

00:35:26.349 --> 00:35:28.358
It reduces some of the information.

00:35:28.358 --> 00:35:38.284
So, in other words, every time you save a JPEG, the process takes some of the data out of the file.

00:35:38.284 --> 00:35:41.795
If you do it enough times, the picture starts degrading.

00:35:41.795 --> 00:35:49.655
So a JPEG should not be saved again and again and again and again, because you actually end up with a picture which looks more and more rubbish.

00:35:49.655 --> 00:35:54.012
That doesn't happen with a PNG file.

00:35:54.012 --> 00:36:02.356
Disadvantage of a PNG file it's a larger file size than JPEG, but you can still upload PNG files onto the internet.

00:36:02.356 --> 00:36:03.978
You can still display PNG files onto the internet.

00:36:03.978 --> 00:36:05.346
You can still display PNG files on websites.

00:36:05.346 --> 00:36:13.760
It's a loved format with a lot of history and it has some significant advantages.

00:36:13.760 --> 00:36:23.777
But there are other, now newer files which are coming in, which have been around only a few years, relatively speaking, which are offering even more exciting things.

00:36:23.777 --> 00:36:26.851
The other one which most people have heard of is a TIFF.

00:36:26.851 --> 00:36:27.936
You heard of a TIFF.

00:36:28.244 --> 00:36:32.036
I have heard of a TIFF, but I've never really understood what it is.

00:36:32.036 --> 00:36:34.110
I've never really used a TIFF.

00:36:34.385 --> 00:36:35.568
Okay, so TIFF is.

00:36:35.568 --> 00:36:38.856
T-i-f-f is a tagged image file format.

00:36:38.856 --> 00:36:40.864
See, I'm about as nerdy as they come.

00:36:41.105 --> 00:36:43.954
I mean I'm very impressed, Very impressed.

00:36:44.454 --> 00:36:47.594
Oh God, I was taught this stuff back in the late 90s.

00:36:47.594 --> 00:36:52.155
I was working for a charity and we wanted to run a website.

00:36:52.155 --> 00:36:56.572
So we had someone come in and spend a couple of days with me and all this stuff's coming from that.

00:36:56.572 --> 00:37:02.978
So a TIFF is a really high quality image.

00:37:02.978 --> 00:37:04.650
There is no image quality loss when you produce.

00:37:04.650 --> 00:37:05.454
A TIFF is a really high quality image.

00:37:05.454 --> 00:37:07.505
There is no image quality loss when you produce a TIFF.

00:37:07.505 --> 00:37:18.211
So when you save a TIFF, you can save it in such a way that you can reduce the file size, but in a way, what is called lossless it doesn't lose any data.

00:37:18.211 --> 00:37:21.012
You can actually do lossless or you can do lossy.

00:37:21.012 --> 00:37:21.554
That's good.

00:37:21.554 --> 00:37:24.614
A lossy, you can lose data and a lossless doesn't.

00:37:24.614 --> 00:37:26.831
Now we're getting into super nerd.

00:37:26.831 --> 00:37:30.233
Okay, I'm going to get a super nerd T-shirt.

00:37:30.925 --> 00:37:32.472
I'm going to get that for you for Christmas.

00:37:32.684 --> 00:37:33.739
Can I have a cape as well?

00:37:33.760 --> 00:37:33.943
Yeah.

00:37:34.485 --> 00:37:35.710
And can I wear my pants on the outside?

00:37:35.831 --> 00:37:39.954
No, well, maybe with Linda, not with us.

00:37:43.186 --> 00:37:44.150
Am I going to keep that in?

00:37:44.150 --> 00:37:49.666
Yes, I forgot what I was saying now, anyway.

00:37:49.666 --> 00:38:06.175
So a TIFF file was devised to produce an image that hasn't lost quality, doesn't lose quality and in fact produces incredibly high detail, and it tends to be used by printing companies.

00:38:06.175 --> 00:38:23.596
So if you were, say, you were, producing a book or some illustrations for a catalogue or a brochure for a holiday company, the printing company would much prefer you sent them a TIFF, because the data that comes across in the image file is huge.

00:38:23.596 --> 00:38:30.188
It's pretty much close onto that that comes in in a royal.

00:38:30.188 --> 00:38:30.708
There's no loss of data.

00:38:30.708 --> 00:38:30.909
So it is.

00:38:30.909 --> 00:38:52.766
It's a fantastic way to produce a superb, high quality image, and if I was working for an advertising company and I wanted images which just look stellar on a big poster, I'd produce it as a TIFF, because there's no loss of data and you don't lose data every time you save it, which you do with a JPEG.

00:38:52.766 --> 00:38:58.056
So a TIFF is the highest possible level of detail quality.

00:38:58.056 --> 00:38:59.177
It's right up there with raw.

00:39:00.306 --> 00:39:18.771
I wish I'd known that years and years and years ago, when I was doing the photography for fleet panto, because, um, we did billboards around fleet and I was just sending them jpegs, wow I'm learning.

00:39:20.193 --> 00:39:21.795
Big file sizes are huge.

00:39:21.795 --> 00:39:25.179
Yeah, huge, huge, huge file sizes.

00:39:25.179 --> 00:39:34.572
Yeah, they tend only to be used by companies which have got big computers with massive hard drives, because the space they take up is massive amazing, so I just have.

00:39:34.813 --> 00:39:41.889
I have one more on uh, on jpegs, which I've never asked anybody and I could just go home and google it.

00:39:41.889 --> 00:39:55.746
But you seem to be the uh, the oracle of file formats the jedi master yeah, so I'm gonna ask you just because there are no silly questions and someone else might be thinking it.

00:39:55.746 --> 00:40:08.541
When I export my images, more often than not I'm given the option for a jpeg, but there's also a second jpeg option.

00:40:08.541 --> 00:40:10.650
Do you know what I'm talking about?

00:40:10.650 --> 00:40:11.713
Jpeg 2000?

00:40:11.813 --> 00:40:29.489
yes, tell me about that launch were the same people the joint photographic experts group in the year 2000, as a way to produce a jpeg product that was um smaller in file size, that compressed but didn't deteriorate quite so much.

00:40:29.489 --> 00:40:33.224
It had some other cool stuff as well, but it never really took off.

00:40:33.224 --> 00:40:45.288
Um and um, despite it really offering so much more than the original JPEG, no one really adopted it.

00:40:45.288 --> 00:40:48.429
It's been a bit of a failure when it has worked.

00:40:48.429 --> 00:40:49.414
This is interesting.

00:40:49.414 --> 00:40:56.068
The compression routine that they use to shrink it down without losing data is used in the cinema industry.

00:40:56.068 --> 00:41:02.221
When you go to the cinema, you go to the movie house, the local view or the Odeon and you're watching a digital projection on the screen.

00:41:02.221 --> 00:41:04.327
The format they use is JPEG 2000.

00:41:05.250 --> 00:41:07.434
Wow, you really are the oracle.

00:41:07.434 --> 00:41:22.672
What I love about these podcasts is I go straight back into student mode, and I don't know whether it's because we're sitting in the room that I had my year mentoring with you, but I just I love it.

00:41:22.672 --> 00:41:27.706
I feel like I can ask you anything, and and and I don't feel silly.

00:41:27.706 --> 00:41:30.833
So thanks for that my absolute pleasure.

00:41:30.974 --> 00:41:32.096
Does that bring us to an end?

00:41:32.597 --> 00:41:34.728
I think it might well.

00:41:34.829 --> 00:41:35.931
Thanks again for coming over.

00:41:35.931 --> 00:41:39.277
Thank you for having me looking forward to two weeks time.

00:41:39.277 --> 00:41:41.108
Do I can't remember what we're doing, can you did?

00:41:41.108 --> 00:41:42.612
Did you look on the spreadsheet?

00:41:42.612 --> 00:41:43.454
We've got a spreadsheet.

00:41:43.454 --> 00:41:44.637
We've got a very fancy spreadsheet.

00:41:44.637 --> 00:41:47.889
We've got a year's worth of subjects on a spreadsheet.

00:41:47.889 --> 00:41:49.688
That's how organised we are.

00:41:49.889 --> 00:41:51.655
Well, that's how organised you are.

00:41:51.655 --> 00:41:54.251
I can't take credit for that.

00:41:55.545 --> 00:41:58.572
Well, you looked at it and agreed I did yes, there you go.

00:41:59.947 --> 00:42:01.989
Oh, what is the next one?

00:42:06.751 --> 00:42:08.217
I've just remembered what it is.

00:42:08.217 --> 00:42:15.036
Yes, he says looking at it on the screen yes, oh, my goodness, this is going to be a corker, isn't it?

00:42:15.476 --> 00:42:15.757
It is.

00:42:15.757 --> 00:42:19.188
This is one of these.

00:42:19.188 --> 00:42:34.286
I'm going to be really honest now and it might lose me a little bit of respect from fellow photographers, but I don't care, because I feel like I'm going to be really honest now and it might lose me a little bit of respect from fellow photographers, but I don't care because I feel like I'm here representing the less tech savvy photographers in the world.

00:42:35.088 --> 00:42:46.201
Um, and also I think I've mentioned before I'm dyslexic, and this subject is one that doesn't matter how many times I'm told about it.

00:42:46.201 --> 00:42:49.896
I just do not retain the information.

00:42:49.896 --> 00:42:51.922
So this is going to be interesting.

00:42:51.922 --> 00:42:56.474
I'm going to have a lot of questions and I need you to find a way to explain this.

00:42:56.755 --> 00:42:57.697
Let's not tell them.

00:42:58.125 --> 00:43:02.496
No, we won't, but I need you to find a way to explain this so that I'm going to retain it.

00:43:02.496 --> 00:43:05.454
Yeah, I kind of get it.

00:43:05.454 --> 00:43:06.639
I get this so that I'm going to retain it.

00:43:06.639 --> 00:43:07.342
Yeah, I kind of get it.

00:43:07.342 --> 00:43:07.804
I get the concept.

00:43:08.806 --> 00:43:20.885
I just can't explain it, and it's constantly changing, which doesn't help.

00:43:20.885 --> 00:43:23.840
Now there are people listening to this and are thinking what the are they?

00:43:23.811 --> 00:43:24.443
talking about.

00:43:24.443 --> 00:43:27.478
Put your guesses in the comments below.

00:43:27.498 --> 00:43:32.108
Yes, we can say so, we're not talking for the next session, because that'll be another one of my solo sessions.

00:43:32.108 --> 00:43:34.195
Why answer a question from the listeners?

00:43:34.195 --> 00:43:37.068
This is going to be in two weeks time.

00:43:37.068 --> 00:43:43.900
Yeah, yeah, kind of looking forward to that.

00:43:44.965 --> 00:43:46.731
I'm going to go straight back into student mode.

00:43:46.731 --> 00:43:47.914
Oh yeah, again.

00:43:49.827 --> 00:43:55.824
So I can tell you now, before the listeners know what we're talking about.

00:43:55.824 --> 00:43:59.034
I have every not sympathy.

00:43:59.034 --> 00:44:14.168
I have every empathy with you on what I perceive your position to be on this, because I think, in my heart of hearts, my allegiance is more with your point of view than what the current point of view is globally.

00:44:14.168 --> 00:44:20.393
Okay, good, all right, and there were lots of reasons for that, which I'll be happy to talk about.

00:44:20.393 --> 00:44:25.355
Kelly, absolutely brilliant session.

00:44:25.355 --> 00:44:26.898
Thank you so much, Thank you.

00:44:26.898 --> 00:44:33.536
So I think it's about time to say goodbye, and it's goodbye from Tog Talk, which is myself, Kevin Ahronson.

00:44:35.027 --> 00:44:36.632
And me, Kelly Perrin.

00:44:37.666 --> 00:44:38.695
It's goodbye from me.

00:44:39.306 --> 00:44:40.409
And it's goodbye from me.

00:44:40.992 --> 00:44:43.626
Bye, hi.

00:44:43.626 --> 00:44:47.974
This is Kevin Ahronson and I'd like to invite you to something really quite unique.

00:44:47.974 --> 00:44:50.594
It's called A Photographer's Evening.

00:44:50.594 --> 00:45:00.335
For the last six years, I have held small in-person roundtable gatherings with local photographers who are new to Hampshire School of Photography.

00:45:00.335 --> 00:45:10.097
The evenings are completely free and they are a great opportunity to talk about photography, share advice and network with other like-minded people.

00:45:10.097 --> 00:45:24.039
These evenings are designed for photographers who are still early in their photography journey, those who have never attended before any of our workshops and aren't professional or semi-professional photographers.

00:45:24.039 --> 00:45:32.675
Over the course of the evening, we'll dive into various photography topics and you'll have a chance to submit your own photos for review if you'd like.

00:45:32.675 --> 00:45:43.802
It's a relaxed, friendly setting where you can explore your progress, ask questions and gain loads of valuable insight from someone with decades of experience.

00:45:43.802 --> 00:45:49.193
If you're interested, head over to the GoHSPcom website to learn more.

00:45:49.193 --> 00:45:52.139
I'll post a link in the show notes below.